PLACE OF THE NATIONAL STATE IN CONDITIONS OF GLOBAL
ECONOMY WITH THE SPECIAL REVIEW OF COUNTRIES, BRIC-S
MEMBERS
Nenad Dugalić
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31410/limen.2018.35
4th International Scientific – Business Conference LIMEN 2018 – Leadership & Management: Integrated Politics of Research and Innovations, Belgrade – Serbia, December 13, 2018, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS published by: Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans, Belgrade, Serbia; Faculty of Engineering Management – Belgrade, Serbia; Modern Business School – Belgrade, Serbia; Faculty of Business and Management Sciences – Novo Mesto, Slovenia; Faculty of Business Management and Informatics – Novo Mesto, Slovenia; Business Academy Smilevski – BAS, Skopje, Macedonia; BAS Institute of Management, Bitola, Macedonia, ISBN 978-86-80194-15-8
integrity and sovereignty of national states. In this context, social conflicts that invalidate or
prevent the manifestation of positive effects of globalization can also be induced. However, the
requirement to preserve the economic sovereignty of national states should not be an obstacle
to their cooperation on both regional and international level. Although such cooperation in the
conditions of globalization is implied, it should be suitable to the expectations for achieving, a
socially more righteous and humane world society. Furthermore, in the conditions of an
advanced globalization process, only strong and well-organized states that have full knowledge
of the critical factors that are bearers of social phenomena and have the opportunity to survive
as entities rather than objects, systems of international relations.
[1] Marković, D. (2001) Globalizacija i nacionalni integritet, Ekonomske teme, Ekonomski
fakultet, Niš, str. 8.
[2] Mencinger, J. (2001) Kako smo obarali tolar, Ekonomist magazin, br. 80, Beograd, op. cit.
[3] Vidojević, Z. (2005) Kuda vodi globalizacija, Institut društvenih nauka, Filip Višnjić,
Beograd, str. 77.
[4] Bek, U. (2003) Virtuelni poreski obveznici, u: Vuletić, V. (prir.), Globalizacija – mit ili
stvarnost, Zavod za udžbenike i nastavna sredstva, Beograd, str. 134.
[5] Ibidem.
[6] Trifković, S. (1999) Od globalizma do posthumanizma – ideološka osnova zapadne
politike na Balkanu, Sociološki pregled, vol. XXXIII, br. 3-4, Sociološko društvo Srbije,
Beograd, str. 258-260.
[7] Brdar, M. (2001) Institutionalization of Human Rights and Globalization, International
Law and Ethics Conference Series, Annual Meetings, Belgrade, p. 5.
[8] Pečujlić, M. (2002) Globalizacija, dva lika sveta, Gutenbergova galaksija, Beograd, str.
71.
[9] Forester, V. (1997) Doživljavamo preobražaj društva, pa čak i civilizacije, Unesko
glasnik, Beograd, str. 47.
[10] Armijо, L. E., Roberts, C. (2014) The emerging powers and global governance: Why the
BRICS matter′, in: Looney, R. E. (ed.), Handbook of Emerging Economies, Routledge,
London, p. 518.
[11] Hurrell, A. (2006) Hegemony, liberalism and global order: what space for would-be
great powers? International Affairs, vol. 82, no. 1, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp.
1-19.
[12] Carvalho, C. E. et al. (2015) O banco e o arranjo de reservas do BRICS: iniciativas
relevantes para o alargamento da ordem monetaria e financeira internacional. Estudos
internacionais. vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 45-70.
[13] Ocić, Č. (2002) Strategije razvoja, Institut za društvene nauke, Beograd, str. 79.
[14] Drašković, V. (2001) Pojam, uzroci i posledice globalizacije, u: Vukotić, V. (ur.),
Globalizacija i tranzicija, Institut društvenih nauka, Beograd, str. 145.
[15] Stiglitz, J. E. (2005) The Post Washington Consensus, Initiative for Policy Dialogue,
Working Paper Series, Task Force on Governance of Globalization, Columbia
University, p. 4.
[16] Petrović, D. (2004) Filozofske implikacije globalizma i antiglobalizma, cited according
to: Beker, E. (2005) Ekonomski aspekti globalizacije, Privredna izgradnja, vol. XLVIII,
br. 3-4, str. 148
