All full papers accepted for the LIMEN International Scientific Conference will undergo an editorial and peer-review process. Based on the review and selection process, accepted papers will be published in one of the following conference publications:
LIMEN Selected Papers
Papers selected on the basis of their scientific quality, originality, relevance, and contribution will be published in LIMEN 2026 Selected Papers β the 12th Conference on Leadership, Innovation, Management and Economics. The publication will be assigned ISSN, ISBN, and DOI numbers.
The LIMEN Selected Papers publication has been indexed in Scopus since 2022, and the 2026 edition will also be indexed in Scopus in accordance with the regular indexing procedure. The publication will be submitted for coverage in Web of Science CPCI SSH.
LIMEN Conference Proceedings
All other full papers that are accepted for presentation and publication but are not selected for the LIMEN Selected Papers will be published in the LIMEN 2026 Conference Proceedings. The publication will be assigned ISSN, ISBN, and DOI numbers.
The LIMEN Conference Proceedings have also been indexed in Scopus since 2022, and the 2026 edition will be indexed in Scopus in accordance with the regular indexing procedure. The publication will be submitted for coverage in Web of Science CPCI SSH.
LIMEN Book of Abstracts
Abstracts of papers presented at the LIMEN 2026 Conference will be published in the LIMEN 2026 Book of Abstracts, which will be assigned ISSN and ISBN numbers.
For papers whose full versions are published in either the LIMEN Selected Papers or the LIMEN Conference Proceedings, their abstracts will not be published in the Book of Abstracts.
A certificate of presentation/attendance will be emailed to all registered authors after the conference.
Official language of the LIMEN conference is English. Papers may be written and presented in English.
Except for the conference registration fee, there are no additional or hidden publication costs.
In order to avoid high commissions on money transfers by bank wire transfer, which may go up to 35% of the transferred amount, participants may pay the conference registration fee via PayPal credit/debit card (5% commission).
All received papers prior peer review process will be subject of plagiarismΒ check with Crosscheck powered by Crossref software. Afterwards,Β papers will be peer reviewed by the reviewers drawn from the scientific committee or external reviewers depending on the topic, title and the subject matter of the paper.
Selection of papers which will be presented at the conference day will be based upon quality, originality, and relevance.
LIMEN Conference Instructions for Full Paper Preparation
Download file
LIMEN Conference Biography form
Download file
Connect with us
Registration and peer review process
Abstracts are submitted on the website β email submissions are not accepted.Β Each abstract is reviewed in a double-blind peer review process. The double-blind review process ensure that both authors and reviewers remain anonymous during the peer review process. Authors do not know who conducted their reviews, reviewers do not know whose abstract/paper they are reviewing.
Peer reviewers are pre-registered on the website. At the beginning of the review period, peer reviewers are requested to confirm that they are available to review abstracts and/or full papers. Peer reviewers should be aware that the MINIMUM time required to review an abstract is 20-30 minutes.
Peer reviewers complete their review on the website, which involves both multiple-choice selects and free-form comment assessments. Peer reviewers should be prepared to provide some detail, particularly for negative evaluations. Reviewers can provide feedback for the author, and also private feedback for the editor.
Authors will be notified by email if their abstract has been accepted. There is no second review of abstracts that have been accepted βwith modificationβ. The modification of the abstract takes place when the full paper is submitted.
Full papers are submitted for double-blind peer review after successful acceptance of a conference abstract. Peer reviewers complete their review on the website, which involves both multiple-choice selects and free-form comment assessments.
Peer reviewers provide a critical assessment of the paper, and may recommend improvements. Although the author may choose not to take this advice, it is highly recommended that the author address any issues, explaining why their research process or conclusions are correct.
Notes for Peer Reviewers
Peer reviewers should be aware that the MINIMUM time required to review a paper is at least 1 hour and significantly more time is common in order to do them justice. Peer reviewers should be prepared to provide some detail, particularly for negative evaluations.
If you are invited to review a full paper, please consider:
- Do you have time to do the review by the deadline?
- Is the article within your area of expertise?
- Are you sure you will complete the review by the deadline?
Peer review of full papers is NOT about correcting grammar, spelling, poorly written references. It is about reviewing the academic validity and relevance of the paper! As a reviewer, if you find yourself correcting spelling, you are probably becoming bogged down in the detail, when you are meant to be assessing the βbig pictureβ!
Full papers are evaluated against the following criteria:
1. The title, abstract and keywords must accurately reflect the paperβs contents.
2. The research must be relevant to the conference theme/s.
3. The research methodology must be sound.
4. The paper must be well-structured and clearly written.
5. References must be relevant and accurate.
The conference scientific committee makes decisions where there is a significant discrepancy between reviewer evaluations. Authors may be asked to revise their full paper where it does not correspond to their abstract, where layout or references are formattedΒ incorrectly, to correct grammar or improve on the paper quality.
Where the conference committee requires a revision, the paper will not be published without the revision or an approved explanation of the issue.
Any identified plagiarism will automatically disqualify a paper.
