Iva Tรซrova (Pendavinji) – Fan. S. Noli University, Faculty of Ecomony, Bulevardi Rilindasit 11, 7001, Korรงa, Albania
Keywords:
ECtHR;
Pilot judgment;
Property;
Impact;
Legislation;
Structural dysfunction
Abstract: Attempting to address systemic violations of human rights on the domestic level, pilot judgments impose an obligation on States to take reยญmedial measures to prevent vast numbers of repetitive applications or clone cases before the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR or the Court). Acยญcordingly, they serve as catalysts by fostering transformative changes withยญin a stateโs legal framework and aligning domestic law with the European Convention of Human Rights standards.
The paper aims to analyze the procedure and features of pilot judgments, enshrined in Rule 61 of Rules of Court. Delving on ECtHR case law, it gives a brief overview of the pilot judgment procedure adopted for Albaniaโs strucยญtural dysfunction of non-compensation for properties nationalized during the communist regime in Manushaqe Puto and others v. Albania. Furtherยญmore, the effectiveness of remedies undertaken by the Albanian authorities is assessed.
The paper concludes by emphasizing the proactive role played by the ECยญtHR in shaping Albaniaโs legislation and hence advancing the protection of property rights.
Download file
LIMEN Conference
9th International Scientific-Business Conference – LIMEN 2023 – Leadership, Innovation, Management and Economics: Integrated Politics of Research – CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, Hybrid (Graz University of Technology, Graz, Austria), December 7, 2023
LIMEN Conference Proceedings published by the Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans, Belgrade, Serbia
LIMEN Conference 2023 Conference Proceedings: ISBN 978-86-80194-78-3, ISSN 2683-6149, DOI: https://doi.org/10.31410/LIMEN.2023
Creative Commons Nonย Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission.ย
Suggested citation
Tรซrova (Pendavinji), I. (2023). Beyond Adjudication: European Court of Human Rights Pilot Judgmentโs Role in Shaping Albanian Legislation. In V. Bevanda (Ed.), International Scientific-Business Conference – LIMEN 2023: Vol 9. Conference Proceedings (pp. 457-466). Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans. https://doi.org/10.31410/LIMEN.2023.457
References
Assembly of the Republic of Albania. (2015, December 5). Law no.133/2015 โOn Treatment of Propยญerty and Finalisation of the Property Compensation Process Act. Retrieved January 29, 2024, from https://www.drejtesia.gov.al/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Ligj_133_05122015_perditesuยญar_2017.pdfย
Committee of Ministers. (2004, May 12). Judgments Revealing an Underling Systemic Problem. Council of Europe. Retrieved January 29, 2024, from https://search.coe.int/cm/Pages/result_deยญtails.aspx?ObjectID=09000016805dd190ย
Committee of Ministers. (2004, May 12). โThe Improvement of Domestic Remediesโ. Council of europe. Retrieved January 29, 2024, from https://search.coe.int/cm/Pages/result_details.aspx?ObjectID=09000016805dd190ย ย
Committee of Ministers. (2018, September 20). Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights 16 cases against Albania. Strada lex Europe. Retrieved January 29, 2024, from https://www.stradalex.eu/en/se_src_publ_jur_eur_cedh/document/echr_604-07_001-186853
Committee on Legal Affairs and Human Rights. (2011, April 18). States with major structural/systemยญic problems before the European Court of Human Rights: statistics. Parliamentary Assembly. Retrieved January 29, 2024, from https://assembly.coe.int/CommitteeDocs/2011/ajinfdoc05%202011rev_EN.pdfย ย ย
Constitutional Court. (1994, April 8). Decision no.4. Constitutional Court of Albania. Retrieved Janยญuary 29, 2024, from https://www.gjk.gov.al/web/Vendime_perfundimtare_100_1.phpย
Constitutional Court. (2011, June 1). Decision no.20. Constitutional Court of Albania. Retrieved Janยญuary 29, 2024, from https://www.gjk.gov.al/web/Vendime_perfundimtare_100_1.phpย
Constitutional Court. (2017, January 16). Decision no. 1. Gjykata Kushtetuese. Retrieved January 29, 2024, from https://www.gjk.gov.al/web/Vendime_perfundimtare_100_1.phpย
Constitutional Court. (2021, January 16). Decision no.1. Constitutional Court of Albania. Retrieved January 29, 2024, from https://www.gjk.gov.al/web/Vendime_perfundimtare_100_1.phpย
Constitutional Court. (2023, November 8). Press release. Constitutional Court of Albania. Retrieved January 29, 2024, from https://www.gjk.gov.al/web/NJOFTIM_PER_SHTYP_2821_1.phpย
Council of Europe. (1950, November 4). European Convention on Human Rights. ECHR. Retrieved January 29, 2024, from https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/d/echr/convention_ENGย
Council of Europe. (1952, March 20). Protocol to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, as amended by Protocol No. 11. of the European Court of Huยญman Rights. Retrieved January 29, 2024, from https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/d/echr/Library_Collection_P1postP11_ETS009E_ENGย ย
Council of Ministers. (2016, March 23). Decision No. 221 โOn the organization and operation of the Agency for Treatment of Propertyโ. Retrieved January 29, 2024, from https://planifikimi.gov.al/inยญdex.php?eID=dumpFile&t=f&f=4499&token=d32332a2d347a9e7ae6436740c6e73346716a5d2ย
CouncilofMinisters.(2016, March23). DecisionNo. 222โOntheExaminationofRequestsfortheRecogniยญtion of the Right to Compensationโ,. Retrieved January 29, 2024, from https://planifikimi.gov.al/inยญdex.php?eID=dumpFile&t=f&f=4498&token=bd555e0d9c8ba052cae6fb64bef209488d7fa3ccย
Council of Ministers. (2016, March 23). Decision No. 223 โOn the determination of financial evaluaยญtion and the enforcement of compensationโ. Retrieved January 29, 2024, from https://atp.gov.al/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/VKM-nr-223-date-2332016-perditesuar_230615_093952.pdfย
ECtHR. (2004, June 22). BRONIOWSKI v. POLAND (Application no. 31443/96). HUDOC. Retrieved Januยญary 29, 2024, from https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre#%7B%22itemid%22:[%22001-61828%22]%7Dย
ECtHR. (2004, September 28). Kopeckรฝ v. Slovakia, Application No. 44912/98. HUDOC. Retrieved Januยญary 29, 2024, from https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#%7B%22itemid%22:[%22001-66758%22]%7Dย
ECtHR. (2006, June 19). Hutten-Czapska v. Poland, Application no.35014/97. HUDOC. Retrieved Januยญary 29, 2024, from https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#%7B%22itemid%22:[%22001-75882%22]%7Dย
ECtHR. (2007, December 4). Wolkenberg and Others v. Poland, Application no. 50003/99. HUDOC. Retrieved January 29, 2024, from https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#%7B%22itemid%22:[%22001-83935%22]%7Dย ย
ECtHR. (2009, January 15). Burdov v. Russia (no. 2), Application no. – 33509/04. HUDOC. Retrieved Januยญary 29, 2024, from https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#%7B%22itemid%22:[%22002-1756%22]%7Dย
ECtHR. (2009, July 30). Verein gegen Tierfabriken Schweiz (VgT) v. Switzerland (no. 2), Appcliยญaction no.32772/02. HUDOC. Retrieved January 29, 2024, from https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#%7B%22itemid%22:[%22001-93265%22]%7Dย
ECtHR. (2012, July 31). CASE OF MANUSHAQE PUTO AND OTHERS v. ALBANIA (Applications nos. 604/07, 43628/07, 46684/07 and 34770/09). HUDOC. Retrieved January 29, 2024, from https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre#%7B%22itemid%22:[%22001-112529%22]%7Dย
ECtHR. (2020, March 17). Beshiri and Others v.Albania, no.29026/06, 3165/08, 56956/10, 29127/11, 6311/12, 8904/12, 5915/14, 53846/14, 57152/14, 67059/14, 72755/14, 537/15. HUDOC. Retrieved January 29, 2024, from https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-202475%22]}
ECtHR. (2023, March). The ECHR and Albania in facts & figures. Retrieved January 29, 2024, from https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/d/echr/Facts_Figures_Albania_ENGย
Glas, L. R. (2019). The Execution Process of Pilot Judgments before the Committee of Ministers. Human Rights & International Legal Discourse, 13(2), pp.73-97. https://repository.ubn.ru.nl/handle/2066/216926ย
Paraskeva, C. (2006, December 7). Human Rights Protection Begins and Ends at Home: The โPiยญlot Judgment Procedureโ Developed by the European Court of Human Rights. University of Nottingham. Retrieved January 29, 2024, from https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/hrlc/documents/publications/hrlcommentary2007/pilotjudgmentprocedure.pdfย ย
Republic of Albania Assembly. (1998, October 21). ALBANIA CONSTITUTION. Venice Commisยญsion. Retrieved January 29, 2024, from https://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/deยญfault.aspx?pdffile=CDL-REF(2016)064-eย
Rules of Court. (2023, October 30). ECHR. Retrieved January 29, 2024, from https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/d/echr/rules_court_engย ย
Supreme Court of Albania. (2021, February 24). Decision no.242.
Supreme Court of Albania, Civil Bench. (2018, February 7). Decision no.611.
Sushko, Y. (2019, June 24). Pilot and quasi-pilot judgments of the European Court of Human Rights: Ensuring Enhanced Protection of Human Rights. Visnyk of the Lviv University. Series Law, (68), 50-62. Research Gate. https://doi.org/10.30970/vla.2019.68.050ย