Katya Antonova – University of Economics -Varna, Faculty of Business, 77 Knyaz Boris I Blvd , 9000, Varna, Bulgaria
Keywords:
Circular economy;
Sustainable construction;
Certification systems;
Assessment indicators
Abstract: Construction activities are among the main contributors to the greenhouse effect, high consumption of natural resources, production of huge amounts of waste and energy consumption during the life cycle of buildings, suggesting that the study of these activities is of utmost importance. Ensuring a balance between economic development, human well-being and environmental needs is a major challenge of our time in the context of the circular economy. The author of this paper aims to analyze the existing knowledge and methodologies for the certification of sustainable buildings and to consider the possibilities for an integrated assessment of their sustainability throughout their life cycle.
Download file
LIMEN Conference
9th International Scientific-Business Conference – LIMEN 2023 – Leadership, Innovation, Management and Economics: Integrated Politics of Research – CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, Hybrid (Graz University of Technology, Graz, Austria), December 7, 2023
LIMEN Conference Proceedings published by the Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans, Belgrade, Serbia
LIMEN Conference 2023 Conference Proceedings: ISBN 978-86-80194-78-3, ISSN 2683-6149, DOI: https://doi.org/10.31410/LIMEN.2023
Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission.
Suggested citation
Antonova, K. (2023). Certification and Assessment of Sustainable Construction in a Circular Economy. In V. Bevanda (Ed.), International Scientific-Business Conference – LIMEN 2023: Vol 9. Conference Proceedings (pp. 269-279). Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans. https://doi.org/10.31410/LIMEN.2023.269
References
ASUS. (n.d.). Circular economy model. Retrieved from https://esg.asus.com/en/circular-economy/circular-economy-model
Brundtland Report. (1987). Our common future.
Ecoinvent. (n.d.). http://www.ecoinvent.org
ENSLIC-SEC-WP3-100331. (2010). Guidelines Rumanian, Grant Agreement № EIE/07/090/ SI2.467609.
European Commission. (2019). European Green Deal. https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal_en
European Commission. (2023). Circular Economy Action Plan. https://environment.ec.europa.eu/strategy/circular-economy-action-plan_en
European Council. (2022). EUCO 34/22, CO EUR 29, CONCL 7. Retrieved from https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/60873/2022-12-15-euco-conclusions-bg.pdf
European Parliament. (2023). Circular economy: Definition, importance, and benefits. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/topics/en/article/20151201STO05603/circular-economy-definition-importance-and-benefits
Geldermans, B., Tenpierik, M., & Luscuere, P. (2019). Circular and flexible infill concepts: integration of the residential user perspective. Sustainability, 11(1).
Hertwich, E. G. (2020). Carbon fueling complex global value chains tripled in the period 1995– 2012. Energy Economics, 86, 104651.
ISO. (2017). ISO 15643-5:2017.
Janjua, S. Y., Sarker, P. K., & Biswas, W. K. (2020). Development of triple bottom line indicators for life cycle sustainability assessment of residential buildings. Journal of Environmental Management, 264.
Kloepffer, W. (2008). Life cycle sustainability assessment of products. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 13(2), 89–95.
Langdon, D. (2007). Life cycle costing (LCC) as a contribution to sustainable construction – Guidance on the use of the LCC Methodology and its application in public procurement. David Langdon, Management Consulting.
Liu, S., & Qian, S. (2018). Towards sustainability-oriented decision making: model development and its validation via a comparative case study on building construction methods. Sustainable Development, 27(5), 860–872.
OECD. (2018). Global Material Resources Outlook to 2060.
Onat, N. C., Kucukvar, M., & Tatari, O. (2013). Integrating triple bottom line input-output analysis into life cycle sustainability assessment framework: the case for US buildings. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 19(8), 1488–1505.
Purvis, B., Mao, Y., & Robinson, D. (2019). Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins. Sustainability science, 14, 681-695.
Regulation (EC) No 305/2011. (2011). European Parliament and Council Regulation on harmonized conditions for the marketing of construction products. Official Journal of the European Union, L 88, 4.4.2011.
Toosi, H. A., et al. (2020). Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment in Building Energy Retrofitting: A Review. Sustainable Cities and Society, 60.
Valdivia, S., Ugaya, C. M. L., Hildenbrand, J., Traverso, M., Mazijn, B., & Sonnemann, G. (2012). A UNEP/SETAC approach towards a life cycle sustainability assessment—our contribution to Rio+20. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 18(9), 1673- 1685. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-012-0529-1
World Bank. (2018). What a Waste 2.0: A Global Snapshot of Solid Waste Management to 2050
