Ivan Jovetiฤ – University of Donja Gorica; MSI INVEST Ltd, Montenegro
Keywords:
Technoeconomic changes;
Economic security;
Paradigm;
Evolution;
Cyber
Abstract
The history of technological changes has confirmed its impact on (r)evolution of security concepts and paradigms. However, it is not an un- known correlation and has its roots in what Kuhn has been defining as the normal science problem and eventually scientific revolution. Civilizationsโ his– tory has proven the impact of technology on societies from the wheel to the cyber. And whenever Kuhnโs normal science or current patterns and solutions were unable to solve rising challenges and changes the new (r)evolution rise and led to the paradigm changes. Respective has an impact on the economy, security as well as economic security. Each one of them is the core subject of evolving and the rise of the new subjectโs paradigm. Distinct impacts on security as well as the concept of individual security are the core focus of this article. In addition, it is a consequential attempt to identify the common denominator between security as the concept as well as its subconcepts like individual security, economic security and corporate security. Changes in technology especially cyber security concepts and machine learning followed by artificial intelligence are the drivers of the (r)evolution of the paradigm in the economic security context. Similar to the technologically impacted Cold War arms race, the new IT arms race is one of the identified outcomes of the evolved paradigm in security. It seems like a similar yet differently driven impact. Finally, all aforementioned is changing the future of security in general but also in particular concerning changes and impacts on individual(s) security. Therefore, it is highly important to understand and follow respective changes including paradigm shifts. And unlike Goetheโs view on technology, paradigm shift understanding might support us within the challenges.
![](https://mediacontent.limen-conference.com/2019/03/pdf.png)
ย ย Download file
![Open_Access-e1606158100869](https://limen-conference.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Open_Access-e1606158100869.png)
LIMEN Conference
8th International Scientific-Business Conference – LIMEN 2022 – Leadership, Innovation, Management and Economics: Integrated Politics of Research – CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, Hybrid (EXE Budapest Center, Budapest, Hungary), December 1, 2022,
LIMEN Conference proceedings published by the Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans, Belgrade, Serbia
LIMEN Conference 2022 Conference proceedings: ISBN 978-86-80194-66-0, ISSN 2683-6149, DOI:ย https://doi.org/10.31410/LIMEN.2022
Creative Commons Nonย Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission.ย
Suggested citation
Jovetiฤ, I. (2022). Economic and Security Paradigm: The Ongoing (R)Evolution?. In V. Bevanda (Ed.), International Scientific-Business Conference โ LIMEN 2022: Vol 8. Conference proceedingsย (pp. 115-127). Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans.ย https://doi.org/10.31410/LIMEN.2022.115
References
Accenture/Ponemon Institute. (2019). The Cost of Cybercrime, Network Security, Volume 2019, Issue 3, https://doi.org/10.1016/S13534858(19)30032-7
Akerlof, G. A., & Kranton, R. E. (2012). Ekonomija identiteta, MATE, Zagreb.
Baldwin, D. A. (1997). The concept of security, Review of International Studies 23, 5-26, Brit- ish International Studies Association.
Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society, Sage, London.
Brauch, H. G. (2005). Threats, Challenges, Vulnerabilities and Risks in Environmental and Hu- man Security, United Nations University, Institute for Environment and Human Security
Buzan, B. (1983). People, States and Fear: The National Security Problem in International Re- lations, Harvester Wheatsheaf Especially long-range and unmanned weapons.
Dixon, P. (2011). ล est lica buduฤnosti, Profil, Zagreb
Ejdus, F. (2012). Meฤunarodna bezbednost: teorije, sektori i nivoi, JP Sluลพbeni glasnik i Beo- gradski centar za bezbednosnu politiku, Beograd
Elzeser, J. (2009). Nacionalna drลพava i fenomen globalizacije, Jasen, Beograd
Jovetiฤ, I. (2013). Implikacije tehnologije na politike i strategiju bezbjednosti i odbrane, Inter- national Scientific Conference โ The Balkans Between Past and Future: Security, Confli- ct Resolution and Euro-Atlantic Integration, Ohrid, str. 559-572. Fakultet za bezbjednost, Skopje.
Jovetiฤ, I. (2020). Technoeconomic Changes and Security โ New Paradigm, Contemporary Ma- cedonian Defense, Vol. 20, No. 39, Ministry of Defense of the Republic of North Macedo- nia, 1409-8199 ISSN; UDK 355/359
Jovetiฤ, I. (2020). Uticaj tehnoloลกkih i ekonomskih promjena na bezbjednost, doktorska diser- tacija, UDG-Fakultet za meฤunarodnu ekonomiju, finansije i biznis, Doktorske studije โMeฤunarodna ekonomijaโ, Podgorica.
Jovetiฤ, I. (2021). Economics and Security: The Paradigm (R)Evolution, Journal of Internatio- nal Business and Economics, American Research Institute for Policy Development, ISSN 2374-2208 (Print) 2374-2194 (Online)
Kaku, M. (2011). Physics of the Future: How Science Will Shape Human Destiny and Our Dai- ly Lives by the Year 2100, Doubleday, New York
Kennedy, P. (1989). The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers, Random House, New York
Lee, K-F. (2018). AI Super-powers China, Silicon Valley and the new world order, Houghton Miflin Harcourt, Boston, New York.
Lewis, J. (2018). Economic Impact of CybercrimeโNo Slowing Down, CSIS. Mumford, L. (1934). Technics and Civilization, Routledge, London.
National Security Strategy of the United States. (2010). www.whitehouse.org
Pascual, C., & Elkind, J. (2010). Energy Security: Economics, Politics, Strategy and Implica- tions, The Brookings Institution, Washington
Perkins, J. (2012). Ispovesti ubice ekonomije, Plato, Beograd
Rice, S. E., Graff, C., & Pascual, C. (2010). Weak States and US National Security, The Brook- ings Institution, Washington.
Smith, A. (2008). Teorija moralnih osjeฤanja, CID, Podgorica. Vukotiฤ, V. (2011). Istorija buduฤnosti, CID, Podgorica.
Wolfers, A. (1952). “National Security” as an Ambiguous Symbol, Political Science Quarterly, Vol. 67, No. 4., The Academy of Political Science.
ย Additional reading
ย Benjamin, W. (1942). Theses on the Philosophy of History, The Institute for Social Research, NY. Kun, T. S. (1974). Struktura nauฤnih revolucija, Nolit, Beograd.
Tofler, A. & Tofler, H. (1998). Rat i antirat, Paidea, Beograd.
Waltz, K. (1959). Man, the State and the War, Columbia University Press, New York.