fbpx

Dijana Grahovac – Central Bank of Bosnia and Herzegovina and University of Business Studies Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina
Senad Softić – Central Bank of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Economic Faculty in Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina

 

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31410/LIMEN.2020.113

 

6th International Scientific-Business Conference – LIMEN 2020 – Leadership, Innovation, Management and Economics: Integrated Politics of Research – CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, Online/virtual, November 26, 2020, published by the Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans, Belgrade; Printed by: SKRIPTA International, Belgrade, ISBN 978-86-80194-39-4, ISSN 2683-6149, DOI: https://doi.org/10.31410/LIMEN.2020

 

Abstract

The effectiveness and efficiency of CEFTA 2006, even after almost a decade and a half, are far from utilising the potential. Member States act more as competitors than as partners, manifested by a significant number of formal and informal non-tariff barriers. There is no true will to fully exploit the potential offered by the free trade zone. This is also reflected in the low utilisation of financial resources envisaged for joint cross-border cooperation projects of IPA I and IPA II funds. All countries focus their international exchanges through trade with the EU, and intra-CEFTA trade is focused only on exports. The EU is making efforts to connect more tightly countries by supporting mini-Schengen project for Western Balkans. The paper will try to answer the questions: what economic benefits can the mentioned model bring and is politics a significant obstruction? The comparative regression analysis of the impact of the exchange of goods and services on the economic development of the member states for CEFTA 1992 and CEFTA 2006 will be presented in the paper. The analysis will be done by using the SPSS statistical program.

 

Keywords

CEFTA 2006, Mini Schengen, Countries of Western Balkan, External trade, Economics, Politics.

 

References

Baldwin, R.E., Openness and growth: What’s the empirical relationship?. In Challenges to globalization: Analyzing the economics (pp. 499- 526), University of Chicago Press, 2004.
Bjelić, P., Dragutinović-Mitrović R., Unaprijeđenje pozicije Srbije u okviru CEFTA 2006, Belgrade, 2018.
Daitoh, I., Environmental Protection and Trade Liberalization in a Small Open Dual Economy, Review of Development Economics, Vol. 12, Issue 4, pp. 728-736, November 2008
Dollar, D., & Kraay, A., Trade, growth, and poverty, World Bank, Development Research Group, Macroeconomics and Growth, 2001
Dowrick, S., Duc-Tho, N., OECD Comparative Economic Growth 1950-1985: Catch-Up and Convergence. American Economic Review, 79 (5): 1010-1030, 1989
Gligorov,V., Trade and Investment in the Balkans, in Vladimir Gligorov and Hermine Vidovic, On the Way to Normality – The States on the Territory of Former Yugoslavia in the Postwar Period, WIIW Paper no. 250, October 1978, str. 1 – 7. See: www.wiiw.ac.at/balkans/files/gligorov.pdf
Krueger, A., Why trade liberalisation is good for growth, The Economic Journal, 108(450), 1513-1522, 1998;
Krugman, P., Obstfeld, M., Rev. ed. of International economics: Theory and Policy, Pearson Series in Economics, 2009;
Krugman, P., On the Relationship Between Trade Theory and Location Theory, Review of International Economics, p 364, 1993.
Međak, V. (editor) Effects of Stabilisation and Association Agreements and CEFTA2006 on WB6 European Integration and Regional Cooperation: Achievements and Ways Forward, European Movement in Serbia, Belgrade, 2018
Rodriguez, F., Rodrik, D., Trade policy and economic growth: a skeptic’s guide to the cross-national evidence, In NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2000, Volume 15 (pp. 261-338). MIT Press, 2001;
Rodrik, D., Subramanian, A., Trebbi, F., Institutions rule: the primacy of institutions over integration and geography in economic development, 2002;
Sachs, J.D., Warner, A., Economic reform and the process of global integration Brook. Pap. Econ. Act., 1 (pp. 1-118) 1995.
Sachs, J.D., Warner, A., Economic reform and the process of global integration Brook. Pap. Econ. Act., 1 (pp. 1-118) 1995;
Wacziarg, R., Horn Welch, K., Trade Liberalization and Growth: New Evidence, NBER Working Paper No. 10152, Issued in December 2003.

 

Download Full Paper

 

 

 

Connect with us

Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans – UdEkoM Balkan
179 Ustanicka St, 11000 Belgrade, Republic of Serbia

https://www.udekom.org.rs/home

Udekom Balkans is a dynamic non-governmental and non-profit organization, established in 2014 with a mission to foster the growth of scientific knowledge within the Balkan region and beyond. Our primary objectives include advancing the fields of management and economics, as well as providing educational resources to our members and the wider public.

Who We Are: Our members include esteemed university professors from various scientific disciplines, postgraduate students, and experts from ministries, public administrations, private and public enterprises, multinational corporations, associations, and similar organizations.

Building Bridges Together: Over the course of ten years since our establishment, the Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans has established impactful partnerships with more than 1,000 diverse institutions across the Balkans region and worldwide.

LIMEN conference publications are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.