fbpx

Igor Jašurek – Faculty of National Economy of the University of Economics in Bartislava, Dolnozemská cesta 1 852 35, Slovakia

 

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31410/LIMEN.2020.141

 

6th International Scientific-Business Conference – LIMEN 2020 – Leadership, Innovation, Management and Economics: Integrated Politics of Research – CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, Online/virtual, November 26, 2020, published by the Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans, Belgrade; Printed by: SKRIPTA International, Belgrade, ISBN 978-86-80194-39-4, ISSN 2683-6149, DOI: https://doi.org/10.31410/LIMEN.2020

 

Abstract

Implementation of cohesion policy, as the major EU budgetary chapter, is subject
to vast scholarship. Therefore, surprisingly enough, the principal-agent (P-A) framework has
received little recognition in this academic field so far. The present paper contributes to the
expansion of this increasingly popular approach also into cohesion scholarship by examining
the operation of Information and Consultancy Centres (ICC) in Slovakia. The major finding
shows limits of the P-A framework by suggesting that instead of a mutual conflict, it is a
cooperative mode dominantly shaping dynamics of P-A relations due to the shared goals and
interests. ICC operations and relations with the Government are interpreted via observational
equivalence and ceremonialism as the recognized P-A framework tools.

 

Keywords

ICC, Principal, Agent, Uncertainty costs, Observational equivalence, Ceremonialism.

 

References

Bache, I. (1999). The extended gatekeeper: Central government and the implementation of EC regional policy in the UK. Journal of European Public Policy, 6(1), 28-45.
Bache, I. (2010). Partnership as an EU policy instrument: A political history. West European Politics, 33(1), 58-74.
Bachtler, J. and McMaster, I. (2008). EU cohesion policy and the role of the regions: investigating the influence of structural funds in the new member states. Environment and Planning, C 26(2), 398–427.
Bachtler, J. and Ferry, M. (2013). Conditionalities and the performance of European structural funds: A principal-agent analysis of control mechanisms in European Union cohesion policy. Regional studies, (49)8, 1258-1273.
Barca, F. (2009). An agenda for a reformed cohesion policy. A place-based approach to meeting European Union challenges and expectations. Independent report prepared at the request of Danuta Hübner, Commissioner for Regional Policy, Brussels.
Bauer, M. (2002). The EU “partnership principle”: still a sustainable governance device across multiple administrative arenas? Public Administration, 80(4), 769–89.
Blom-hansen, J. (2005). Principals, agents, and the implementation of EU cohesion policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 12(4), 624-648.
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 240/2014 on the European code of conduct on partnership in the framework of the European structural and investment funds. Official Journal of the European Union.
Damro, C. (2007). EU delegation and agency in international trade negotiations: A cautionary comparison. Journal of Common Market Studies, 45(4), 883–903.
Delreux, T. and Adriaensen, J. (2017). Introduction. Use and limitations of the principal-agent model in studying the European Union. In T. Delreux and J. Adriaensen (Eds.) The Principal Agent Model and the European Union. (pp. 1-34). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, Palgrave Studies in European Union Series. https://doi10.1007/978-3-319-55137-1
Dür, A. and Elsig, M. (2011). Principals, agents, and the European Union’s foreign economic policies. Journal of European Public Policy, (18)3, 323-338
Epstein, D. and O’Halloran, S. (1994). Administrative procedures, information, and agency discretion. American Journal of Political Science, 38(3), 697-722.
Hawkins, G. D. and Jacoby, W. (2009). How agents matter. In D. G. Hawkins, D. A. Lake, D. L. Nielson, and M. J. Tierney (Eds.) Delegation and Agency in International Organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511491368
Kassim, H. and Menon A. (2003). The principal–agent approach and the study of the European Union: promise unfulfilled? Journal of European Public Policy. 10(1), 121-139.
Metodický Pokyn č. 25, verzia 3 (2018) [Methodology Guidance no. 25, version 3]. Centrálny koordinačný orgán, c, Bratislava.

Metodický Pokyn č. 25, verzia 4 (2019) [Methodology Guidance no. 25, version 4]. Centrálny koordinačný orgán, Úrad podpredsedu vlády SR pre investície a informatizáciu, Bratislava.
McCubbins, M. D. and Schwartz, T. (1984). Congressional oversight overlooked: police patrols versus fire alarms. American Journal of Political Science, 28, 165-179.
Moe, T. (1984). The New Economics of Organization. American Journal of Political Science, 28 (4), 739-777.
Perrow, C. (1986). Economic theories of organization. Theory and Society, 15, 11-45.
Pollack, M. A. (1997). Delegation, Agency, and agenda setting in the European Community. International Organisation, 51 (1), 99-134
Pollack, M. (2002). Learning from the Americanists (again): Theory and method in the study of delegation. West European Politics, 25(1), 200–219.
Polverari, L. and Michie, R. (2009). New partnership dynamics in a changing cohesion policy context. IQ-Net Thematic Paper, 25(2), 1-86.
Programové vyhlásenie vlády Slovenskej republiky na obdobie rokov 2020 – 2024, Uznesenie vlády č. 239/2020. (2020) [Manifesto of the Government of the Slovak Republic 2016-2020, Government Resolution No. 239/2020].
Shavel, S. (1979). Sharing and incentives in the principal and agent relationship. The Bell Journal of Economics. 10(1), 55-73.
Sobol, M. (2015). Principal–agent analysis and pathological delegation: The (almost) untold story. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions. (29)3, 335-350
Sumárna Správa o Činnosti Informačno-poradenských Centier za obdobie od 1.7. do 31.12.2019 (2019). [Summary report on activities of Information and Consultancy Centres between 1 July and 31 December 2019]. Úrad podpredsedu vlády SR pre investície a informatizáciu, Bratislava
Sumárna Správa o Činnosti Informačno-poradenských Centier za obdobie od 1.1. do 30.6.2020 (2020). [Summary report on activities of Information and Consultancy Centres between 1 January and 30 June 2020]. Ministerstvo investícií, regionálneho rozvoja a informatizácie SR, Bratislava.
Zhodnotenie Administratívnej Záťaže na Strane Žiadateľov a Prijímateľov v Procese Implementácie Pomoci z Fondov EÚ v Programovom Období 2007-2013. (2013). [Assessing Administrative Burden on the Part of Applicants and Beneficiaries in the Process of Implementing EU Funds in the Programming Period 2007-2013]. Úrad vlády SR, Bratislava.
Zmluva o Poskytnutí Nennávratného Finančného Príspevku č. 750/2016 (2016). [Grant Award Agreement no. 750/2016] https://www.crz.gov.sk/data/att/2593386_dokument1.pdf
Zmluva o Poskytnutí Nennávratného Finančného Príspevku č. 1311/2019 (2019). [Grant Award Agreement no. 1311/2019] https://www.crz.gov.sk/data/att/4371853_dokument1.pdf

 

Download Full Paper

 

 

 

Connect with us

Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans – UdEkoM Balkan
179 Ustanicka St, 11000 Belgrade, Republic of Serbia

https://www.udekom.org.rs/home

Udekom Balkans is a dynamic non-governmental and non-profit organization, established in 2014 with a mission to foster the growth of scientific knowledge within the Balkan region and beyond. Our primary objectives include advancing the fields of management and economics, as well as providing educational resources to our members and the wider public.

Who We Are: Our members include esteemed university professors from various scientific disciplines, postgraduate students, and experts from ministries, public administrations, private and public enterprises, multinational corporations, associations, and similar organizations.

Building Bridges Together: Over the course of ten years since our establishment, the Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans has established impactful partnerships with more than 1,000 diverse institutions across the Balkans region and worldwide.

LIMEN conference publications are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.