fbpx

Delia-Raluca ศ˜ancariuc – Doctoral School of Economics and International Business, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania

Dragoศ™ Cosmin-Lucian Preda – Doctoral School of Economics and International Business, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania

7th International Scientific-Business Conference – LIMEN 2021 – Leadership, Innovation, Management and Economics: Integrated Politics of Research – CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, Online/virtual, December 16, 2021, published by the Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans, Belgrade; Printed by: SKRIPTA International, Belgrade, ISBN 978-86-80194-54-7, ISSN 2683-6149, DOI: https://doi.org/10.31410/LIMEN.2021

Keywords:
Institutions;
Initial social conditions;
Instrumental variable

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31410/LIMEN.2021.27

Abstract

Economic literature has widely discussed the importance of instiยญtutions in general, and that of monetary freedom in particular, for economic growth in post-communist countries, yet less is known about the determiยญnants of institutional quality in these countries. While some studies argued that initial social conditions matter for institutional building, not much emยญpirical work has been done to econometrically demonstrate their influence. The present paper fills this void by using regression analysis in order to assess the impact of the strength of civil society right after the fall of communism on monetary freedom in subsequent years, on a sample of former commuยญnist countries. As a simple OLS regression is prone to endogeneity problems, the author uses an instrumental variable approach, instrumenting the iniยญtial strength of civil society through the number of victims of terror during communism. The paper proves that the initial strength of civil society has a positive, significant and sizeable impact on monetary freedom 5-6 years after the transition process has begun.

Download file

LIMEN Conference

Creative Commons Nonย Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission.ย 

References

Barro, R. J. (1995). Inflation and economic growth. NBER Working Paper 5326.

Beck, T., & Laeven, L. (2006). Institution building and growth in transition economies. Journal of Economic Growth, 11(2), 157-186.

Campos, N. F., & Coricelli, A. (2002). Growth in transition: what we know, what we donโ€™t, and what we should. Journal of economic literature, 40(3), 793-836.

Cebula, R., Clark, J. R., & Mixon, F. (2012). The impact of economic freedom on per capita real GDP: a study of OECD nation.

Cukierman, A., Miller, G. P., & Neyapti, B. (2002). Central bank reform, liberalization and inflation in transition economies โ€“ an international perspective. Journal of monetary ecoยญnomics, 49(2), 237-264.

De Gregorio, J. (1992). The effects of inflation on economic growth: Lessons from Latin Amerยญica. European Economic Review, 36(2-3), 417-425.

De Haan, J., & Sturm, J. E. (2000). On the relationship between economic freedom and ecoยญnomic growth. European journal of political economy, 16(2), 215-241.

Debelle, G., Savastano, M. A., Masson, P. R., & Sharma, S. (1998). Inflation targeting as a framework for monetary policy. International Monetary Fund.

Efendic, A., Pugh, G., & Adnett, N. (2011). Institutions and economic performance: A meta-reยญgression analysis. European Journal of Political Economy, 27(3), 586-599.

Eydam, U., & Gabriadze, I. (2021). Institutional development in transition economiesโ€“the role of institutional experience. Post-Soviet Affairs, 37(2), 99-118.

Goel, R. K., & Nelson, M. A. (2005). Economic freedom versus political freedom: crossโ€counยญtry influences on corruption. Australian Economic Papers, 44(2), 121-133.

Gurgul, H., & Lach, ล. (2011). The nexus between economic freedom and growth: Evidence from CEE countries in transition. MPRA Paper No. 37434.

Heckelman, J. C. (2000). Economic freedom and economic growth: A short-run causal investiยญgation. Journal of Applied Economics, 3(1), 71-91.

Ivanoviฤ‡, V., & Staniลกiฤ‡, N. (2017). Monetary freedom and economic growth in new European Union member states. Economic research-Ekonomska istraลพivanja, 30(1), 453-463.

Loungani, P., & Sheets, N. (1997). Central bank independence, inflation, and growth in transiยญtion economies. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 381-399.

McMullen, J. S., Bagby, D. R., & Palich, L. E. (2008). Economic freedom and the motivation to engage in entrepreneurial action. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(5), 875-895.

Miller, T., Kim A. B., & Roberts, J. M. (2021). 2021 Index of Economic Freedom. The Heritage Foundation.

Mushtaq, S., & Ali Khan, R. E. (2018). Economic freedom and sustainable development: A Panยญel Data Analysis. The Pakistan Journal of Social Issues. Special Issue, 89-97.

North, D. C. (1990). Political economy of institutions and decisions: Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. United Kingdom, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Peev, E., & Mueller, D. C. (2012). Democracy, economic freedom and growth in transition econยญomies. Kyklos, 65(3), 371-407.

Redek, T., & Suลกjan, A. (2005). The impact of institutions on economic growth: The case of transition economies. Journal of Economic Issues, 39(4), 995-1027.

Roland, G. (2002). The political economy of transition. Journal of economic Perspectives, 16(1), 29-50.

Sachs, J. D. (1996). The Transition at Mid Decade. The American Economic Review, 86(2), 128- 133.

Saha, S., Gounder, R., & Su, J. J. (2009). The interaction effect of economic freedom and democยญracy on corruption: A panel cross-country analysis. Economics Letters, 105(2), 173-176.

Sarel, M. (1996). Nonlinear effects of inflation on economic growth. Staff Papers, 43(1), 199- 215.

Sufian, F., & Habibullah, M. S. (2010). Does economic freedom fosters banksโ€™ performance? Panel evidence from Malaysia. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 6(2), 77-91.

Ugur, M. (2010). Institutions and economic performance: a review of the theory and evidence. Available at SSRN 2102746.

 

Connect with us

Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans โ€“ UdEkoM Balkan
179 Ustanicka St, 11000 Belgrade, Republic of Serbia

https://www.udekom.org.rs/home

Udekom Balkans isย a dynamic non-governmental and non-profit organization, established in 2014 with a mission to foster the growth of scientific knowledge within the Balkan region and beyond. Our primary objectives include advancing the fields of management and economics, as well as providing educational resources to our members and the wider public.

Who We Are: Our members include esteemed university professors from various scientific disciplines, postgraduate students, and experts from ministries, public administrations, private and public enterprises, multinational corporations, associations, and similar organizations.

Building Bridges Together: Over the course of ten years since our establishment, the Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans has established impactful partnerships with more than 1,000 diverse institutions across the Balkans region and worldwide.

LIMEN conference publications are licensed under aย Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.