fbpx

Rezart Prifti – Department of Management, Faculty of Economy, UT, Albania

Ana Shkreta – Department of Management, Faculty of Economy, UT, Albania

7th International Scientific-Business Conference – LIMEN 2021 – Leadership, Innovation, Management and Economics: Integrated Politics of Research – CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, Online/virtual, December 16, 2021, published by the Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans, Belgrade; Printed by: SKRIPTA International, Belgrade, ISBN 978-86-80194-54-7, ISSN 2683-6149, DOI: https://doi.org/10.31410/LIMEN.2021

Keywords:
Blended learning;
LMS self-efficacy;
Multimedia instruction;
Perceived satisfaction;
Perceived usefulness;
Perceived ease of use;
Behavioral intention

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31410/LIMEN.2021.213

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to analyze the learning curve of first-time users and experienced users of blended learning methodology and their perception of eLearning platforms. We investigate student relation with blended learning approach aggregated in first time users and expeยญrienced users, analyzing a multitude of factors with a sample size of 1021 students in university premises. Their approach is tested empirically through regression analysis by measuring the learning curve accumulation among two main categories of users. The implications of this study are practical for organizations and practitioners implementing innovative approaches in education. Data shows that first time users are more likely to share the experience, use the portal as an assisting tool in learning, and see blended learning as more helpful. While experienced users see it as a pure operationยญal tool, spending more time on it, being more confident, and value the expeยญrience by perceiving satisfaction and usefulness.

Download file

LIMEN Conference

Creative Commons Nonย Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission.ย 

References

Anthony, B., Kamaludin, A., Romli, A., Raffei, A. F. M., Phon, D. N. A. L. E., Abdullah, A., & Ming, G. L. (2020). Blended Learning Adoption and Implementation in Higher Education: A Theoretical and Systematic Review. Technology, Knowledge and Learning. https://doi. org/10.1007/s10758-020-09477-z

Baber, H. (2020). Determinants of studentsโ€™ perceived learning outcome and satisfaction in online learning during the pandemic of COVID19. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 7(3), 285โ€“292. https://doi.org/10.20448/JOURNAL.509.2020.73.285.292

Baxter, J. A., & Haycock, J. (2014). Roles and student identities in online large course forums: Implications for practice. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learnยญing, 15(1), 20โ€“40. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i1.1593

Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Schmid, R. F., Tamim, R. M., & Abrami, P. C. (2014). A meta-analysis of blended learning and technology use in higher education: From the genยญeral to the applied. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 26(1), 87โ€“122. https://doi. org/10.1007/s12528-013-9077-3

Bonk, C. J., & Graham, C. R. (2012). The Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs Memorial. John Wiley & Sons., 33(1). https://doi.org/10.21225/d51g6h

Bruggeman, B., Tondeur, J., Struyven, K., Pynoo, B., Garone, A., & Vanslambrouck, S. (2021). Experts speaking: Crucial teacher attributes for implementing blended learning in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100772

Chigeza, P., & Halbert, K. (2014). Navigating E-learning and blended learning for pre-service teachers: Redesigning for engagement, access and efficiency. Australian Journal of Teachยญer Education, 39(11), 133โ€“146. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2014v39n11.8

Cigdem, H., & Ozturk, M. (2016). Factors Affecting Studentsโ€™ Behavioral Intention to Use LMS at a Turkish Post-Secondary Vocational School l sis ( SNA ) in OnlineCourses. 17(3). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i3.2253

Derntl, M., & Motschnig-Pitrik, R. (2005). The role of structure, patterns, and people in blendยญed learning. Internet and Higher Education, 8(2), 111โ€“130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ihedยญuc.2005.03.002

Driscoll, M. (2002). Blended learning: Letโ€™s get beyond the hype. E-Learning, 54. Retrieved from http://www-07.ibm.com/services/pdf/blended_learning.pdf

Gardner, R. C. (2006). Motivation and Attitudes in Second Language Learning. In K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics (Second Edition) (Second Edi, pp. 348โ€“ 355). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/00625-8

Gide, A. (2019). Blended Learning: A New Hybrid Teaching Methodology. Online Submission, 3(13), 5โ€“24.

Gilboy, M. B., Heinerichs, S., & Pazzaglia, G. (2015). Enhancing student engagement using the flipped classroom. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 47(1), 109โ€“114. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2014.08.008

Holden, J., & Westfall, P. (2006). Instructional Media Selection for Distance Learning: A Learnยญing Environment Approach. Distance Learning, 3(2), 1.

Hrastinski, S. (2019). What Do We Mean by Blended Learning? TechTrends, 63(5), 564โ€“569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00375-5

Ikhwan, E. J., & Widodo, P. (2019). Attitude Conception: The Role of Blended Learning in Environmental Education. Online Submission, 2(6), 53โ€“62. https://doi.org/10.32996/ ijllt.2019.2.6.7

Kaur, M. (2013). Blended Learning โ€“ Its Challenges and Future. Procedia โ€“ Social and Behavยญioral Sciences, 93, 612โ€“617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.09.248

Krismadinata, Verawardina, U., Jalinus, N., Rizal, F., Sukardi, Sudira, P., โ€ฆ Novaliendry, D. (2020). Blended learning as instructional model in vocational education: Literature review. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(11B), 5801โ€“5815. https://doi.org/10.13189/ ujer.2020.082214

Liaw, S.-S. (2008). Investigating studentsโ€™ perceived satisfaction, behavioral intention, and efยญfectiveness of e-learning: A case study of the Blackboard system. Computers & Educaยญtion, 51(2), 864โ€“873.

Liaw, S.-S., & Huang, H.-M. (2013). Perceived satisfaction, perceived usefulness and interactive learning environments as predictors to self-regulation in e-learning environments. Comยญputers & Education, 60(1), 14โ€“24.

Maloloy-on, M., Arnado, A., Aviles, G., Solania, N., & Ventura, R. (2021). Teacherโ€™s Reยญsponses on the New Normal Learning Delivery Modalities: Prospective Lifelong Learnยญing Pathway. SMCC Higher Education Research Journal, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.18868/ sherj8j.08.010121.02

Martรญn-Rodrรญguez, Fernรกndez-Molina, ร“scar, Montero-Alonso, Uan-Carlos, Gonzรกlez-Gรณmez, โ€ฆ Francisco. (2014). The main components of satisfaction with e-learning. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 24, 1โ€“11. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2014.888370

Matosas-Lรณpez, L., Aguado-Franco, J. C., & Gรณmez-Galรกn, J. (2019). Constructing an instruยญment with behavioral scales to assess teaching quality in blended learning modalities. Jourยญnal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 8(2), 142โ€“165. https://doi.org/10.7821/ naer.2019.7.410

Nortvig, A. M., Petersen, A. K., & Balle, S. H. (2018). A literature review of the factors influยญencing e-learning and blended learning in relation to learning outcome, student satisfacยญtion and engagement. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 16(1), 45โ€“55.

Pham, L., Limbu, Y. B., Bui, T. K., Nguyen, H. T., & Pham, H. T. (2019). Does e-learning serยญvice quality influence e-learning student satisfaction and loyalty? Evidence from Vietnam. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1). https://doi. org/10.1186/s41239-019-0136-3

Prifti, R. (2020). Implementation of blended learning in a higher education institution in Albaยญnia: An analysis of factors that affect studentsโ€™ learning experience. International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 27(3), 233โ€“253. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIL.2020.106809

Rivers, B. A., Richardson, J. T. E., & Price, L. (2014). Promoting reflection in asynchronous virtual learning spaces: Tertiary distance tutorsโ€™ conceptions. International Review of Reยญsearch in Open and Distance Learning, 15(3), 215โ€“231. https://doi.org/10.19173/IRRODL. V15I3.1777

Rooney, J. E. (2003). Blended Learning Opportunities to Enhance Educational Programming and Meetings. Association Management, 55, 26โ€“32.

Rossett, A., Douglis, F., & Frazee, R. V. (2003). Strategies for Building Blended Learning.

Singh, H., & Reed, S. (2001). A white paper: Achieving success with blended learning. Leerbeยญleving.Nl, 1โ€“11.

Swan, K., & Shih, L. (2014). On the nature and development of social presence in online course discussions.

Vallee, A., Blacher, J., Cariou, A., & Sorbets, E. (2020). Blended learning compared to tradiยญtional learning in medical education: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, Vol. 22. https://doi.org/10.2196/16504

Connect with us

Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans โ€“ UdEkoM Balkan
179 Ustanicka St, 11000 Belgrade, Republic of Serbia

https://www.udekom.org.rs/home

Udekom Balkans isย a dynamic non-governmental and non-profit organization, established in 2014 with a mission to foster the growth of scientific knowledge within the Balkan region and beyond. Our primary objectives include advancing the fields of management and economics, as well as providing educational resources to our members and the wider public.

Who We Are: Our members include esteemed university professors from various scientific disciplines, postgraduate students, and experts from ministries, public administrations, private and public enterprises, multinational corporations, associations, and similar organizations.

Building Bridges Together: Over the course of ten years since our establishment, the Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans has established impactful partnerships with more than 1,000 diverse institutions across the Balkans region and worldwide.

LIMEN conference publications are licensed under aย Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.