LIMEN.2018.481

Bibliometric indicators are traditionally used for the analysis and the assessment
of the competitive position of the countries in nanotechnology. In this paper, the competitive
position of the countries was determined by the number of nanotechnology publications, the
number of citations, and the average number of citations. The data on the observed indicators
published by Statnano in the period 2008-2017 were used. Countries were classified into two
groups according to the observed indicators. The aim of this paper was to provide a review of
the competitive position of the observed (groups of) countries and to determine the level of their
(differential) advantage in the period 2008-2017. It was found that the differential between the
groups is pronounced.
​

competitive position of the countries, differential, nanotechnology
​

[1] Hwang, D. (ed.) (2010) “Ranking the nations on nanotech”, Lux Research,
https://www.electroiq.com/articles/stm/2010/08/ranking-the-nations.html (27.10.2018.)
[2] Kotler, F., Vong, V., Sonders, Dž., Armstrong, G. (2007) Principi marketinga (četvrto
izdanje), Mate, Zagreb.
[3] Milanović-Golubović V. (2003) Međunarodni marketing i globalni biznis (prvo izdanje),
Megatrend univerzitet, Beograd.
[4] Milanović, M. V., Bučalina, A., Golubović, Z. (2014) „Cоmpetitive status of countries in
nanotechnology – considering the importance of forensic applications of nanotechnology“,
Thematic conference proceedings of international significance: Archibald Reiss Days
I/2014, pp. 55-63, Academy of criminalistic and police studies Zemun, Belgrade, German
Foundation for International Legal Cooperation, Bon, German; ISBN 978–86–7020–278–
8 (International scientific conference Archibald Reiss days, Academy of criminalistic and
police studies, Zemun, Belgrade, 3-4 March, 2014).
[5] Nano Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard, https://statnano.com/indicators/nano
(25.10.2018.)
[6] Leydesdorff, L. (2005) „The Evaluation of research and evolution of science indicators“,
Current Science, 89/2005, pp. 1510–1517.
[7] Milanović, M. V., Bučalina Matić, A., Golubović, M. (2016) „Analiza naučnih istraživanja
u nano-tehnologiji“, Megatrend revija, 13(2)/2016, pp. 119-131.
[8] Roco, C. M. (2003) „Nanotechnology: convergence with modern biology and medicine“,
Curr Opin Biotechnol, 14(3)/2003, pp. 337-346, doi: 10.1016/S0958-1669(03)00068-5
[9] Porter, L. A., Youtie, J. (2009) „How interdisciplinary is nanotechnology, J Nanopart Res,
11/2009, pp. 1023-1041, doi: 10.1007/s11051-009-9607-0
[10] Joksimović, D., Cvijanović, D., Milanović, V., Romčević, N. (2014) „The analysis of the
publications in the most active countries in nanotechnology”, Мarketing, 45(3)/2014, pp.
201-212.
[11] Gorjiara, T., Baldock, C. (2014) „Nanoscience and nanotechnology research publications:
a comparison between Australia and the rest of the world“, Scientometrics, 100(1)/2014,
pp. 121–148, doi 10.1007/s11192
[12] Arora, K. S., Porter, L. A., Youtie, J., Shapira, Ph. (2013) „Capturing new developments
in an emerging technology: an updated search strategy for identifying nanotechnology
research outputs“, Scientometrics, 95(1)/2013, pp. 351–370, doi 10.1007/s11192-012-
0903-6
[13] Chen, H., Roco, C. M., Son, J., Jiang, S., Larson A. C., Gao, Q. (2013) „Global
nanotechnology development from 1991 to 2012: patents, scientific publications, and
effect of NSF funding“, J Nanopart Res, 15(9)/2013, pp. 1-21, doi: 10.1007/s11051-013-
1951-4
[14] Thomson Reuters (2013) “Strategic Review of the Nanotechnology Landscape”, KACST
Saudi Arabian.
[15] Еlsevier (2015) „Nanotechnologies Output, Impact and Collaboration, A comparative
analysis of France and other countries“, https://www.elsevier.com/researchintelligence/
resource-library/nanotech-france-2015 (07.10.2018.)
[16] Tang, L., Shapira, P., Youtie, J. (2015) “Is there a clubbing effect underlying Chinese
research citation increases? Journal of the Association for Information Science and
Technology, 66(9)/2015, pp. 1923-1932, https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23302
[17] Gaponenko, N., Dezina, I., Gaponenko, A. (2011) „Mapping the Nanotechnology
innovation system of Russia for preparing future Cooperations between the EU and
Russia“, Nanorucer project, https://www.issras.ru/international/doc/Nanorucer-D4-
Final.pdf (07.11.2018.)
[18] Devereaux, Z., Mogoutov, A., Theoret, C. G., Allard, C. (2008) „Mapping Public Opinion
and Discourse about Nanotechnology in Canada and OECD States“, Data analysis report
– Phase II, https://nexalogy.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/MAPPING-NANOTECHCANADA-
2008-FINAL-TOTAL.pdf (2.11.2018.)
[19] Chen, H. (2007) “Mapping nanotechnology innovations and knowledge. Global and
longitudinal patent and literature analysis”,
https://ai.arizona.edu/sites/ai/files/hchen/04_mumbai-nano-mapping-dec2007.pdf
(6.11.2018.)
[20] Bhattacharya, S., Shilpa (2012) „China Moving Ahead in the Global Nanotechnology
Race: Evidences from Scientometric Study“, Collnet Journal of Scientometrics and
Information Мanagement, 6(1)/2012, pp. 97-117, doi: 10.1080/09737766.2012.10700927
[21] Youtie, J., Shapira, P., Porter, L. A. (2008) „Nanotechnology publications and citations by
leading countries and blocs“, J Nanopart Res, 10(6)/2008, pp. 981-986.
[22] Baradar, R., Tajdaran, M., Musavi, S-M., Abedi, H. (2009) „Mapping the Iranian ISI
papers on Nanoscience and Nanotechnology: a citation analysis approach“, Malaysian
Journal of Library & Information Science, 14(3)/2009, pp. 95-107.

Milanović_Njegić_Vrcelj_ANALIZA KONKURENTSKE POZICIJE NAJAKTIVNIJIH I VIŠE AKTIVNIH ZEMALJA U NANO-TEHNOLOGIJI U PERIODU 2008- 2017. GODINA_pp_481-493